Vladimir Putin has introduced major complications into Donald Trump’s efforts to broker peace in Ukraine by pairing acceptance of the American proposal’s framework with an ultimatum that Ukrainian forces must abandon territories they hold. During a press conference in Kyrgyzstan, the Russian president acknowledged that Moscow received a variant of the peace plan discussed in Geneva and indicated it could serve as a foundation for negotiations.
However, Putin’s willingness to engage came with a severe ultimatum that challenges the foundation of any negotiated settlement. He demanded complete withdrawal of Ukrainian military forces from territories under their control as a prerequisite for ceasing hostilities, characterizing this as a non-negotiable condition. The Russian leader reinforced this demand with threats, stating that Russia would continue pursuing its military objectives through armed conflict if Ukraine refuses to retreat.
Putin added complexity by questioning the legal validity of potential agreements and insisting on recognition of Russian territorial gains. He argued that concluding any deal with Ukraine would be “legally impossible” because Zelensky’s government lacks legitimacy due to the president’s extended tenure without elections, despite international recognition of Ukraine’s administration. Moscow also insists that any peace settlement include formal international acknowledgment of Russia’s territorial conquests.
The American peace initiative has undergone substantial modifications following intense criticism from lawmakers who viewed initial versions as essentially granting Russia its war aims. Original proposals reportedly included requiring Ukraine to surrender Donbas, recognize Russian sovereignty over Crimea, drastically reduce armed forces, prevent deployment of foreign troops or advanced weapons, and permanently forgo NATO membership. After diplomatic pressure from European allies and Ukrainian diplomats, the framework was streamlined from 28 provisions to 19.
President Zelensky confronts an increasingly narrow path between unacceptable alternatives as the war’s toll continues mounting. He has described the dilemma as potentially requiring either a “loss of dignity” or risking the “loss of a key partner,” while acknowledging that compromises may be unavoidable. Ukrainian officials have signaled willingness to engage with the revised proposal and discuss remaining sensitive points with Trump directly, but fundamental questions about territorial integrity remain unresolved. Ongoing violence, including recent Russian drone attacks on civilian areas in Zaporizhzhia, underscores the urgent necessity of finding diplomatic common ground.